Is a US analysis of cost-effectiveness in interventional cardiology relevant to a centrally funded health care system?
نویسنده
چکیده
Conclusions In today's health care environment, decisions about medical interventions need to reflect measures of cost as well as clinical benefit. While it is clear that PTCA is significantly more expensive than medical therapy alone, analyses incorporating quality of life considerations suggest that angioplasty techniques that have been shown to improve clinical outcomes are, for the most part, cost-effective. For example, by reducing symptoms at a modest cost, balloon angioplasty appears to be reasonably cost-effective compared with medical treatment for patients with moderate to severe angina and single vessel coronary disease. Similarly, coronary stenting increases costs for most patients but is associated with improved outcomes compared with conventional PTCA. Formal cost-effectiveness analysis also suggests that these benefits are worth the cost; at least for patients with discrete stenoses that can be treated with a single stent. On the other hand, most other new devices-including rota-tional ablation, directional atherectomy, and excimer laser angioplasty-have not been shown to improve clinical outcome compared with balloon angioplasty. Given the higher procedural and hospital costs associated with these devices, it remains difficult to justify their use at present, except for specific lesion subsets for which angioplasty or stenting are unlikely to be successful or in the setting of ongoing clinical investigation. A comparsion of angio-plasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. MC. Costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with long-term beta-adrenergic antagonists after acute myocardial infarction. Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. N 5 Weinstein MC, Stason WVB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. Myocardial revascularization for chronic stable angina. Analysis of the role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty based on data available in 1989. SB. A comparison of the costs of and quality of life after coronary angioplasty or coronary surgery for multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Results from the Emory
منابع مشابه
The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy
Background: The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Dynamic Interspinous Spacer (Coflex®) and Static Spacer (X-STOP ®) compared to Laminectomy (LAMI) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic literature review in ...
متن کاملCost effectiveness of influenza vaccination for specific populations in Iran
Introduction: Influenza viruses are the major respiratory pathogens worldwide and high-risk groups such as healthcare workers may develop severe forms of the disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination for 4 target groups including pregnant women, elderly people (aged over 65 years), healthcare workers and school-age children in Iran. Metho...
متن کاملIncluding Both Costs and Effects – The Challenge of Using Cost-Effectiveness Data in National-Level Policy-Making: A Response to Recent Commentaries
متن کامل
Use of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden
Background The inclusion of cost-effectiveness data, as a basis for priority setting rankings, is a distinguishing feature in the formulation of the Swedish national guidelines. Guidelines are generated with the direct intent to influence health policy and support decisions about the efficient allocation of scarce healthcare resources. Certain medical conditions may be given higher priority ran...
متن کاملCost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
Background and Aim: Economic evaluation of health interventions by comparing the relevant costs and benefits will result in optimum allocation of resources and increasing the effectiveness of the health system and, through improving equity and increasing accessibility to health services, will lead to increased effectiveness of the health system. The purpose of this study was to critically evalu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Heart
دوره 78 Suppl 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1997